Grindr's controlling shareholders are rushing to take the LGBTQ+ dating app private after a stock decline triggered margin calls on their personal loans, creating an unexpected financial crisis for the profitable company. The move highlights how leveraged ownership structures can force dramatic corporate changes even when business fundamentals remain strong.
Grindr just became the latest casualty of leveraged ownership gone wrong. The LGBTQ+ dating app's majority shareholders are scrambling to take the company private after their personal financial bets backfired spectacularly, according to Semafor's exclusive reporting. Raymond Zage, a former hedge fund manager now based in Singapore, and James Lu, a Chinese-American entrepreneur with stints at Amazon and Baidu, together control over 60% of the dating platform. But their decision to pledge nearly all their Grindr shares as collateral for personal loans has created an unexpected crisis. When the stock began sliding at the end of September, their loans from a unit of Singapore's sovereign wealth fund Temasek became undercollateralized. The result? Temasek seized and sold some shares last week, forcing the owners' hands. The irony isn't lost on market watchers. Grindr's business fundamentals remain solid - profits jumped 25% in the second quarter, and the app continues dominating its niche market. "This appears completely disconnected from the actual performance of the company," one analyst noted, pointing to how leveraged ownership structures can create artificial pressure on profitable businesses. The timeline tells the whole story. Zage and Lu acquired Grindr from Chinese ownership in 2020 for over $600 million amid national security concerns, then took it public through a blank-check merger in 2022 at a $2.1 billion valuation. Their personal borrowing against those shares seemed like smart leverage - until it wasn't. Now they're reportedly in talks with Fortress Investment Group to secure financing for a buyout around $15 per share, valuing Grindr at roughly $3 billion. The potential buyer brings its own complexity - Fortress is majority owned by Mubadala Investment Company, which itself is controlled by Abu Dhabi's government. That foreign ownership angle could raise regulatory eyebrows given 's previous forced sale from Chinese hands. The market reacted swiftly to news of the potential deal, with shares following the report. Investors are clearly betting the take-private move happens, especially given the owners' apparent desperation to avoid further margin calls. What makes this particularly striking is how a profitable, growing company with strong market position finds itself potentially changing hands not because of business performance, but because of its owners' personal financial engineering. has faced some and investor concerns about , but nothing that would typically trigger a take-private scenario. The situation underscores broader risks in today's leveraged ownership environment, where personal financial decisions by controlling shareholders can dramatically reshape public companies regardless of operational performance.