Amazon Q Developer vs Augment Code
AWS's coding assistant, strongest on AWS-native work and legacy Java transformation, with an unusually generous free tier. An agentic coding platform priced flat rather than per seat -- up to 50 users on a single subscription.
At a glance
| Amazon Q Developer | Augment Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $19/seat/mo | $20/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Plans offered | 2 | 3 |
| Team pricing | $19/seat/mo | $100/mo |
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | Augment Code |
| Best for | Teams building on AWS, where the service integration is the point | Small and mid-sized teams, where flat pricing is dramatically cheaper than per-seat |
| Main trade-off | Clearly strongest on AWS-native work; less compelling if your stack is elsewhere | The included usage is a dollar budget, not unlimited -- $20/month of LLM and compute goes quickly across a real team, and top-ups are extra |
The short answer
Choose Amazon Q Developer if teams building on aws, where the service integration is the point. Choose Augment Code if small and mid-sized teams, where flat pricing is dramatically cheaper than per-seat. The rest of this page is the detail behind that.
Pricing
Amazon Q Developer
| Plan | Price | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | 50 agentic requests/month · Latest Claude models in IDE or CLI · Perpetual, not a trial |
| Pro | $19/seat/mo | Expanded agentic request limits · 4,000 lines/month of Java transformation, pooled at account level · Admin dashboards · IP indemnity |
Pricing verified
Augment Code
| Plan | Price | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | $20/mo | Flat, not per seat · Up to 50 seats · $20 of LLM, context and compute usage · CLI and MCP support · SOC 2 Type II · 50 concurrent sessions |
| Business | $100/mo | Flat, not per seat · Up to 50 seats · $100 of included usage |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited users · Multi-region compute · CMEK, ISO 42001 · SSO/OIDC/SCIM |
Pricing verified
Amazon Q Developer
Strengths
- A perpetual free tier with 50 agentic requests a month and access to current Claude models -- more generous than most paid entry tiers were a year ago
- IP indemnity included at $19, where competitors reserve it for enterprise pricing
- Java transformation genuinely automates legacy version upgrades, which is drudgery nothing else targets
- Procurement is trivial where AWS is already an approved vendor
Trade-offs
- Clearly strongest on AWS-native work; less compelling if your stack is elsewhere
- Only two tiers, so there is no middle ground above 50 requests
- Java transformation lines are pooled across the whole account, so a large org shares one budget
- General coding quality is not obviously ahead of cheaper, more focused tools
Amazon Q Developer: who it suits
Buy it if
- Teams building on AWS, where the service integration is the point
- Organisations carrying legacy Java that needs version migration
- Anyone wanting IP indemnity without an enterprise contract
Skip it if
- Developers with no AWS footprint -- the differentiators are all AWS-shaped
- Heavy individual users, since the jump from 50 free requests goes straight to a seat licence
- Teams whose main criterion is raw editing experience, where Cursor and Zed are stronger
Visit Amazon Q Developerfrom $19/seat/mo · free tier available
Augment Code
Strengths
- Flat pricing for up to 50 seats is genuinely unusual -- a ten-person team pays $20/month total, where a per-seat competitor at $39 would charge $390
- No training on your data on every tier, including the cheapest
- SOC 2 Type II at the $20 entry point rather than reserved for enterprise
- Codebase context engine plus CLI and MCP tooling
Trade-offs
- The included usage is a dollar budget, not unlimited -- $20/month of LLM and compute goes quickly across a real team, and top-ups are extra
- No free plan
- Less established than Copilot or Cursor, with a smaller community to lean on
- Standard and Business differ only in included usage, so the tier choice is purely a spend decision
Augment Code: who it suits
Buy it if
- Small and mid-sized teams, where flat pricing is dramatically cheaper than per-seat
- Organisations needing SOC 2 and no-training guarantees without enterprise pricing
- Teams wanting agentic workflows in both editor and terminal
Skip it if
- Individual developers -- the flat-rate advantage only exists across a team, and $20 buys less usage than a per-seat plan gives one person
- Heavy users, since the included budget is consumed quickly and top-ups then apply
- Anyone who needs a free tier to evaluate
Visit Augment Codefrom $20/mo
Common questions
- Is Amazon Q Developer or Augment Code cheaper?
- Amazon Q Developer starts at $19/seat/mo and Augment Code at $20/mo. Amazon Q Developer is cheaper at entry level, though the allowances differ.
- Who should not use Amazon Q Developer?
- Developers with no AWS footprint -- the differentiators are all AWS-shaped. Heavy individual users, since the jump from 50 free requests goes straight to a seat licence. Teams whose main criterion is raw editing experience, where Cursor and Zed are stronger.
- Who should not use Augment Code?
- Individual developers -- the flat-rate advantage only exists across a team, and $20 buys less usage than a per-seat plan gives one person. Heavy users, since the included budget is consumed quickly and top-ups then apply. Anyone who needs a free tier to evaluate.
- Does Amazon Q Developer or Augment Code have a free tier?
- Amazon Q Developer has a free tier; Augment Code does not.