Amazon Q Developer vs GitHub Copilot
AWS's coding assistant, strongest on AWS-native work and legacy Java transformation, with an unusually generous free tier. The incumbent AI coding assistant, embedded across VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim and github.com.
At a glance
| Amazon Q Developer | GitHub Copilot | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $19/seat/mo | $10/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Plans offered | 2 | 6 |
| Team pricing | $19/seat/mo | $19/seat/mo |
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | GitHub |
| Best for | Teams building on AWS, where the service integration is the point | Developers who mainly want excellent autocomplete at the lowest price |
| Main trade-off | Clearly strongest on AWS-native work; less compelling if your stack is elsewhere | Opus-class models are gated behind the $39 Pro+ tier |
The short answer
Choose Amazon Q Developer if teams building on aws, where the service integration is the point. Choose GitHub Copilot if developers who mainly want excellent autocomplete at the lowest price. The rest of this page is the detail behind that.
Pricing
Amazon Q Developer
| Plan | Price | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | 50 agentic requests/month · Latest Claude models in IDE or CLI · Perpetual, not a trial |
| Pro | $19/seat/mo | Expanded agentic request limits · 4,000 lines/month of Java transformation, pooled at account level · Admin dashboards · IP indemnity |
Pricing verified
GitHub Copilot
| Plan | Price | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Limited completions and chat |
| Pro | $10/mo | 300 premium requests/mo · Unlimited completions |
| Pro+ | $39/mo | Opus-class model access · Much larger model allowance |
| Max | $100/mo | Largest individual allowance |
| Business | $19/seat/mo | Org policy management · Audit logs |
| Enterprise | $39/seat/mo | Knowledge bases · Fine-grained controls |
Pricing verified
Amazon Q Developer
Strengths
- A perpetual free tier with 50 agentic requests a month and access to current Claude models -- more generous than most paid entry tiers were a year ago
- IP indemnity included at $19, where competitors reserve it for enterprise pricing
- Java transformation genuinely automates legacy version upgrades, which is drudgery nothing else targets
- Procurement is trivial where AWS is already an approved vendor
Trade-offs
- Clearly strongest on AWS-native work; less compelling if your stack is elsewhere
- Only two tiers, so there is no middle ground above 50 requests
- Java transformation lines are pooled across the whole account, so a large org shares one budget
- General coding quality is not obviously ahead of cheaper, more focused tools
Amazon Q Developer: who it suits
Buy it if
- Teams building on AWS, where the service integration is the point
- Organisations carrying legacy Java that needs version migration
- Anyone wanting IP indemnity without an enterprise contract
Skip it if
- Developers with no AWS footprint -- the differentiators are all AWS-shaped
- Heavy individual users, since the jump from 50 free requests goes straight to a seat licence
- Teams whose main criterion is raw editing experience, where Cursor and Zed are stronger
Visit Amazon Q Developerfrom $19/seat/mo · free tier available
GitHub Copilot
Strengths
- Cheapest credible paid tier at $10/month
- Works in JetBrains, Neovim and Visual Studio, not just VS Code
- Deep GitHub integration for pull requests and code review
- Enterprise procurement is straightforward where GitHub is already approved
Trade-offs
- Opus-class models are gated behind the $39 Pro+ tier
- Codebase awareness is weaker than Cursor on large repositories
- Agentic multi-file work lags the dedicated agent tools
GitHub Copilot: who it suits
Buy it if
- Developers who mainly want excellent autocomplete at the lowest price
- Teams not on VS Code, since editor coverage is far broader
- Organisations where GitHub is already a procured vendor
Skip it if
- Anyone whose main need is large multi-file refactoring -- Cursor and the agent tools are better at it
- Developers who want frontier reasoning models at the entry price, since those start at $39
- Teams wanting a fully autonomous agent rather than an assistant
Visit GitHub Copilotfrom $10/mo · free tier available
Common questions
- Is Amazon Q Developer or GitHub Copilot cheaper?
- Amazon Q Developer starts at $19/seat/mo and GitHub Copilot at $10/mo. GitHub Copilot is cheaper at entry level, though the allowances differ.
- Who should not use Amazon Q Developer?
- Developers with no AWS footprint -- the differentiators are all AWS-shaped. Heavy individual users, since the jump from 50 free requests goes straight to a seat licence. Teams whose main criterion is raw editing experience, where Cursor and Zed are stronger.
- Who should not use GitHub Copilot?
- Anyone whose main need is large multi-file refactoring -- Cursor and the agent tools are better at it. Developers who want frontier reasoning models at the entry price, since those start at $39. Teams wanting a fully autonomous agent rather than an assistant.
- Does Amazon Q Developer or GitHub Copilot have a free tier?
- Both offer a free tier, so you can evaluate each before paying.