Augment Code vs Claude Code

An agentic coding platform priced flat rather than per seat -- up to 50 users on a single subscription. A terminal-based agentic coding tool that takes whole tasks rather than completing lines.

At a glance

Augment CodeClaude Code
Entry price$20/mo$20/mo
Free tierNoNo
Plans offered33
Team pricing$100/moNot published
VendorAugment CodeAnthropic
Best forSmall and mid-sized teams, where flat pricing is dramatically cheaper than per-seatDevelopers comfortable in a terminal who want whole tasks done rather than lines completed
Main trade-offThe included usage is a dollar budget, not unlimited -- $20/month of LLM and compute goes quickly across a real team, and top-ups are extraNo free tier

The short answer

Choose Augment Code if small and mid-sized teams, where flat pricing is dramatically cheaper than per-seat. Choose Claude Code if developers comfortable in a terminal who want whole tasks done rather than lines completed. The rest of this page is the detail behind that.

Pricing

Augment Code

PlanPriceWhat it adds
Standard$20/moFlat, not per seat · Up to 50 seats · $20 of LLM, context and compute usage · CLI and MCP support · SOC 2 Type II · 50 concurrent sessions
Business$100/moFlat, not per seat · Up to 50 seats · $100 of included usage
EnterpriseCustomUnlimited users · Multi-region compute · CMEK, ISO 42001 · SSO/OIDC/SCIM

Pricing verified

Claude Code

PlanPriceWhat it adds
Pro$20/moStandard usage limits · Included with Claude Pro
Max 5x$100/mo5x the usage of Pro
Max 20x$200/mo20x the usage of Pro

Pricing verified

Augment Code

Strengths

  • Flat pricing for up to 50 seats is genuinely unusual -- a ten-person team pays $20/month total, where a per-seat competitor at $39 would charge $390
  • No training on your data on every tier, including the cheapest
  • SOC 2 Type II at the $20 entry point rather than reserved for enterprise
  • Codebase context engine plus CLI and MCP tooling

Trade-offs

  • The included usage is a dollar budget, not unlimited -- $20/month of LLM and compute goes quickly across a real team, and top-ups are extra
  • No free plan
  • Less established than Copilot or Cursor, with a smaller community to lean on
  • Standard and Business differ only in included usage, so the tier choice is purely a spend decision

Augment Code: who it suits

Buy it if

  • Small and mid-sized teams, where flat pricing is dramatically cheaper than per-seat
  • Organisations needing SOC 2 and no-training guarantees without enterprise pricing
  • Teams wanting agentic workflows in both editor and terminal

Skip it if

  • Individual developers -- the flat-rate advantage only exists across a team, and $20 buys less usage than a per-seat plan gives one person
  • Heavy users, since the included budget is consumed quickly and top-ups then apply
  • Anyone who needs a free tier to evaluate

Claude Code

Strengths

  • Genuinely agentic -- give it a task and it edits, runs and iterates across many files
  • Editor-agnostic, since it lives in the terminal
  • The Claude subscription covers both the chat product and the coding tool

Trade-offs

  • No free tier
  • Terminal-first will not suit developers who want everything in the editor UI
  • Heavy agentic sessions consume usage quickly on the $20 tier

Claude Code: who it suits

Buy it if

  • Developers comfortable in a terminal who want whole tasks done rather than lines completed
  • Anyone already paying for Claude Pro, since the tool is included
  • Large refactors and codebase-wide changes

Skip it if

  • Developers who want inline autocomplete as they type -- that is not what this is
  • Anyone who needs a free tier to evaluate before paying
  • Teams wanting a GUI-first experience

Common questions

Is Augment Code or Claude Code cheaper?
Augment Code starts at $20/mo and Claude Code at $20/mo. They are priced the same at entry level, so cost should not decide it.
Who should not use Augment Code?
Individual developers -- the flat-rate advantage only exists across a team, and $20 buys less usage than a per-seat plan gives one person. Heavy users, since the included budget is consumed quickly and top-ups then apply. Anyone who needs a free tier to evaluate.
Who should not use Claude Code?
Developers who want inline autocomplete as they type -- that is not what this is. Anyone who needs a free tier to evaluate before paying. Teams wanting a GUI-first experience.
Does Augment Code or Claude Code have a free tier?
Neither offers a free tier, so evaluating either means paying for at least one month.