Augment Code vs Cursor
An agentic coding platform priced flat rather than per seat -- up to 50 users on a single subscription. A VS Code fork built around AI, with full codebase indexing and multi-file editing.
At a glance
| Augment Code | Cursor | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $20/mo | $20/mo |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Plans offered | 3 | 5 |
| Team pricing | $100/mo | $40/seat/mo |
| Vendor | Augment Code | Anysphere |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized teams, where flat pricing is dramatically cheaper than per-seat | Developers working across large existing codebases |
| Main trade-off | The included usage is a dollar budget, not unlimited -- $20/month of LLM and compute goes quickly across a real team, and top-ups are extra | Twice the price of Copilot Pro for individuals |
The short answer
Choose Augment Code if small and mid-sized teams, where flat pricing is dramatically cheaper than per-seat. Choose Cursor if developers working across large existing codebases. The rest of this page is the detail behind that.
Pricing
Augment Code
| Plan | Price | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | $20/mo | Flat, not per seat · Up to 50 seats · $20 of LLM, context and compute usage · CLI and MCP support · SOC 2 Type II · 50 concurrent sessions |
| Business | $100/mo | Flat, not per seat · Up to 50 seats · $100 of included usage |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited users · Multi-region compute · CMEK, ISO 42001 · SSO/OIDC/SCIM |
Pricing verified
Cursor
| Plan | Price | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
| Hobby | Free | Limited completions · Limited agent requests |
| Pro | $20/mo | 500 fast premium requests/mo · Access to frontier models including Opus-class · Consumption billing beyond quota |
| Pro+ | $60/mo | Substantially higher request allowance |
| Ultra | $200/mo | Highest allowance for sustained agentic work |
| Teams | $40/seat/mo | Central billing · Org privacy controls |
Pricing verified
Augment Code
Strengths
- Flat pricing for up to 50 seats is genuinely unusual -- a ten-person team pays $20/month total, where a per-seat competitor at $39 would charge $390
- No training on your data on every tier, including the cheapest
- SOC 2 Type II at the $20 entry point rather than reserved for enterprise
- Codebase context engine plus CLI and MCP tooling
Trade-offs
- The included usage is a dollar budget, not unlimited -- $20/month of LLM and compute goes quickly across a real team, and top-ups are extra
- No free plan
- Less established than Copilot or Cursor, with a smaller community to lean on
- Standard and Business differ only in included usage, so the tier choice is purely a spend decision
Augment Code: who it suits
Buy it if
- Small and mid-sized teams, where flat pricing is dramatically cheaper than per-seat
- Organisations needing SOC 2 and no-training guarantees without enterprise pricing
- Teams wanting agentic workflows in both editor and terminal
Skip it if
- Individual developers -- the flat-rate advantage only exists across a team, and $20 buys less usage than a per-seat plan gives one person
- Heavy users, since the included budget is consumed quickly and top-ups then apply
- Anyone who needs a free tier to evaluate
Visit Augment Codefrom $20/mo
Cursor
Strengths
- Full codebase indexing makes multi-file edits genuinely reliable
- Frontier models including Opus-class are on the $20 tier, not held back for a higher plan
- Familiar to anyone who already uses VS Code -- extensions and keybindings carry over
Trade-offs
- Twice the price of Copilot Pro for individuals
- Costs become unpredictable once you exceed the request quota and consumption billing starts
- Forking the editor means lagging slightly behind upstream VS Code releases
Cursor: who it suits
Buy it if
- Developers working across large existing codebases
- Anyone who wants Opus-class models without paying for a higher tier
- Teams already standardised on VS Code
Skip it if
- Developers who mainly want inline autocomplete -- you would be paying double for capability you do not use
- Anyone who needs a strictly predictable monthly bill, because usage above quota bills on consumption
- JetBrains or Neovim users unwilling to change editor
Visit Cursorfrom $20/mo · free tier available
Common questions
- Is Augment Code or Cursor cheaper?
- Augment Code starts at $20/mo and Cursor at $20/mo. They are priced the same at entry level, so cost should not decide it.
- Who should not use Augment Code?
- Individual developers -- the flat-rate advantage only exists across a team, and $20 buys less usage than a per-seat plan gives one person. Heavy users, since the included budget is consumed quickly and top-ups then apply. Anyone who needs a free tier to evaluate.
- Who should not use Cursor?
- Developers who mainly want inline autocomplete -- you would be paying double for capability you do not use. Anyone who needs a strictly predictable monthly bill, because usage above quota bills on consumption. JetBrains or Neovim users unwilling to change editor.
- Does Augment Code or Cursor have a free tier?
- Cursor has a free tier; Augment Code does not.