Nvidia fired off an unusual memo to analysts this week clarifying it's not committing accounting fraud, after a viral Substack post from a pet relocation company CEO accused the chip giant of potentially orchestrating "the largest accounting fraud in technology history." The defensive response highlights growing scrutiny over the company's complex web of AI investments and whether they're artificially inflating the broader AI bubble.
A weekend conspiracy theory post that should've died in obscurity instead managed to rattle Nvidia enough that the AI chip giant felt compelled to send a formal note to over 60 analysts declaring it's not the next Enron. The memo, first reported by Barron's, directly addresses claims made in a viral Substack post by what appears to be the CEO of a pet relocation company - yes, really. The post alleges Nvidia is engaged in what "may become the largest accounting fraud in technology history," though that crucial word "may" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. The Verge obtained the company's response memo, which also tackles separate claims by famed short-seller Michael Burry about questionable stock-based compensation accounting. According to Nvidia, Burry appears to have incorrectly added taxes on restricted stock units to reach his numbers. But here's where things get interesting. The fraud allegations, while baseless, have inadvertently spotlighted something far more concerning about Nvidia's business model - its intricate network of investments in so-called "neocloud" companies like CoreWeave, which functions almost like extensions of Nvidia itself. These companies don't make money, so they pile on debt to expand, but their primary job is boosting Nvidia's chip sales. "There is no neocloud that exists without [Nvidia CEO] Jensen [Huang]," analyst Saari noted in previous reporting. That makes these companies, in effect, extensions of Nvidia. Even OpenAI, another Nvidia investment, falls into this category - the massive data center buildout OpenAI wants government backing for involves enormous quantities of Nvidia chips. The Enron comparison isn't entirely off-base, just misapplied. Enron used special purpose vehicles with speculative valuations to hide debt and inflate revenue - crucially, while lying about it. Nvidia's doing something similar in structure but completely above board. Every neocloud it has invested in remains an independent company with debt on its own balance sheet, not Nvidia's. As the company correctly points out in its memo, it doesn't control these companies or provide their financing directly. They're what one analyst called "very useful sin-eaters." , saying "I'm not bashful about reaching out" to Huang. In CoreWeave's case, Nvidia propped up the company by investing directly and ensuring its IPO actually happened, while simultaneously serving as a major customer. It's what analysts describe as "not good behavior, and not healthy behavior," but crucially, "it's legal. Any investor can see this. Many are just choosing not to." The timing of these fraud allegations is particularly rich given that Nvidia executives have been cashing out. , locking in his billionaire status. The company has created seven new billionaires in total through its meteoric rise. Meanwhile, the AI bubble concerns underlying all of this remain very real. If and when that bubble pops, everything that inflated it will have been hiding in plain sight the entire time. Nvidia's investments in the companies that buy its chips represent a potential double-whammy - the company will need to mark down those investments while simultaneously facing a glut of used chips flooding the market as debt holders try to recoup losses. The fraud allegations are missing the forest for the trees. Nvidia doesn't need to commit accounting fraud when it can create a perfectly legal ecosystem of companies that juice its earnings while potentially inflating an AI bubble that benefits everyone involved - at least until it doesn't.