Amazon's Ring security cameras just switched on a controversial new AI feature by default. The company's Search Party tool now scans millions of outdoor cameras to help find lost pets, but users weren't asked permission before their devices were enrolled. The move raises fresh privacy questions for a company already under scrutiny for its data practices.
Amazon's Ring just made a move that has privacy advocates and users scratching their heads. The smart security company quietly rolled out its new Search Party feature - and every outdoor Ring camera is now part of the network by default. The AI-powered tool promises to help reunite lost pets with their owners, but the way it launched is stirring up familiar concerns about consent and data control. When someone posts about a missing dog on Ring's Neighbors app, Search Party springs into action. The system uses AI to scan footage from nearby outdoor Ring cameras and doorbells, hunting for the lost pet across what amounts to a neighborhood surveillance network. If a match is found, the camera owner gets a notification and can choose whether to share the video with the worried pet parent. "Your Ring AI assistant is looking for that dog and is going to tell you, 'Look, this dog I saw looks like this dog that's missing,'" Ring founder Jamie Siminoff explained during a recent Amazon event, according to The Verge's interview. On paper, it's a clever use of AI that could help missing pets get home faster than traditional social media campaigns or neighborhood text chains. The technology essentially automates what neighbors might do manually - check their security footage for signs of a wayward dog. But here's where things get sticky: Ring didn't ask users if they wanted their cameras included in this network. The feature launched with all outdoor Ring cameras automatically enrolled. Users discovered the change through an email from Siminoff noting that "You can always turn off Search Party" - a phrase that assumes most people are fine with the default enrollment. Ring users on Reddit quickly reported finding the feature enabled across their camera systems without any prior notification or opt-in process. While users can disable Search Party and maintain control over what footage gets shared, the default activation feels particularly tone-deaf given Ring's controversial history with law enforcement data sharing. The company has faced criticism for partnerships with police departments and its Community Requests program, which allows agencies to request footage from users. This backdrop makes the default opt-in even more problematic. "This is more about consent than privacy," noted the original . Search Party works similarly to Ring's existing AI alerts for packages, vehicles, and people - your camera footage gets analyzed in Ring's cloud. But there's a key difference: users explicitly chose those other detection features. Nobody asked them to help search for missing pets. The timing of Search Party's launch alongside Ring's new Familiar Faces feature adds another layer of concern. Familiar Faces brings facial recognition to Ring cameras for the first time, letting users register family and friends for personalized alerts. The combination raises obvious questions about whether Ring's growing AI capabilities could eventually be used to search for people, not just pets. Ring spokesperson Yassi Yarger told that "Search Party was designed to match images of dogs to dogs captured in Ring videos" and "is not designed to process human biometrics." She also confirmed that Search Party footage won't be included in the Community Requests program that shares data with law enforcement. Still, the company's assurances about current limitations don't address the broader concern about building surveillance infrastructure first and asking questions later. approach mirrors other tech giants who've faced backlash for changing privacy settings without explicit user consent. The move comes as regulators worldwide scrutinize how tech companies handle user data and implement AI systems. Ring's default enrollment strategy ensures maximum participation, making Search Party more effective at the cost of user autonomy. The network effect means more cameras scanning means better chances of finding missing pets - but it also means more devices enrolled in a system users didn't explicitly choose to join. "We don't want data escaping people's environment without them knowing," Siminoff told , emphasizing that users review any matches before sharing footage. But many would argue the data already escaped their control the moment their cameras were enrolled without permission.
