Amazon's Fire tablet lineup just got a comprehensive review from Wired, and the verdict is complicated. While the tablets deliver exceptional value at under $200, they're hampered by outdated processors and a heavy dependence on Amazon's ecosystem. The review highlights how these devices excel as content consumption machines for Prime subscribers but struggle as standalone tablets for broader use.
Amazon just received a thorough evaluation of its Fire tablet lineup from Wired, and the results paint a picture of devices caught between budget excellence and technological limitations. The comprehensive review, published by Scott Gilbertson, tested every model in Amazon's current Fire tablet range to help consumers navigate the expanding lineup. The timing comes as tablet sales continue growing, with budget devices like Amazon's Fire series capturing significant market share from traditional players like Apple and Samsung. According to recent market data, Amazon holds roughly 9% of the global tablet market, primarily through these aggressively priced Fire devices that start well under $100. Wired's testing reveals a clear value proposition for Amazon Prime subscribers. The Fire OS interface serves as what the review calls "a faucet for Amazon content," with swipeable pages optimized for consuming Prime Video, Amazon Music, Kindle books, and Prime shopping. This tight integration gives Fire tablets a distinct advantage for users already invested in Amazon's ecosystem. The build quality surprised reviewers, who found the plastic construction "designed with enough care that the build quality won't bother you too much." WiFi reception tested as excellent across all models, and front-facing cameras have improved significantly in recent releases. The Kids Editions particularly impressed with rugged bumpers and microSD slots for expandable storage. But the review also exposes significant limitations that potential buyers should consider. The biggest issue isn't hardware - it's software and ecosystem constraints. Fire tablets run a heavily modified version of Android 11, which originally launched in 2020, making these devices feel dated compared to current Android tablets or iPads. Processing power also lags behind competitors. Wired notes "small fits of lag and a general lack of power" compared to more expensive Android tablets, though the reviewers acknowledge that Fire OS apps are typically optimized for weaker hardware. The touchscreens aren't as responsive as premium tablets, though this becomes less noticeable during typical content consumption. Perhaps most limiting is the app ecosystem. While Fire tablets include Netflix and other major streaming apps, the Amazon Appstore offers far fewer options than Google Play Store or Apple's App Store. Non-Amazon content feels like an afterthought, making these tablets less compelling for users who don't plan to consume Amazon content regularly. Wired provides a workaround by linking to their guide for installing Google Play Store on Fire devices, which unlocks access to the full Android app ecosystem. This modification, according to the review, transforms a $60 tablet into something "capable of 95 percent of what a $330 iPad can do." The pricing strategy remains Amazon's strongest selling point. All Fire tablets except the new Max 11 cost $200 or less, with the option to reduce prices by another $15 by accepting lock-screen ads (though Wired recommends against this due to increasingly intrusive advertising). Warranty policies vary strangely across the lineup, with only the Fire HD 10 receiving a full one-year warranty while smaller devices come with just 90-day coverage. This review comes as Amazon faces increased competition in the budget tablet space from Chinese manufacturers and as Apple continues pushing its base iPad to lower price points. The Fire tablet strategy appears designed more to drive Prime subscriber engagement than compete directly on hardware specifications.
